Sometimes I want to know. Sometimes I don’t.

The Weight of Words

Posted by markj on November 15th, 2007 and filed under People, Politics | No Comments »

When did words become so weighty? Have they always been so? Or are we all becoming seriously over-sensitive to them? You can hardly read the news without coming across a story where one person or group was offended or appalled at something said by another person or group. Politicians, who are loath to display the level of their ignorance by actually discussing the issues, would rather hurl indignities back and forth at each other. “How dare they say something like that! I demand an apology!” A celebrity can end his or her career by uttering the wrong word or telling an off-color joke. Someone is sure to be offended and strike up a boycott, causing the corporate pimps to dump the celeb’s sponsorship like a bad habit.

But do words really hurt us so badly? Are our egos and psyches so fragile that they can be permanently damaged by a word or two from some stranger we may not even respect? Maybe we all just enjoy an occasional roll in the mud of self-pity and indignation. Maybe we’re beginning to feel entitled to a life without even the faintest trace of hardship. We’re all so accustomed to “student of the week” and “everybody’s a winner” that the mere hint of something other than praise is suddenly intolerable.

Of course there are those annointed few who are not only allowed to sling crap, but are actually paid huge amounts of money to do so. So called “shock jocks” like Imus and Howard Stern have made careers of offending people, yet even they have paid the price for offending the wrong group of particularly entitled people. And even then, it wasn’t what was said, but who said it. Apparently people in the same entitled group are free to insult others in that group, but God forbid someone outside the group does the same. Republicans were aghast that Clinton had an affair with an intern, yet they turn a blind eye to the far more despicable sins of the Bush administration. Democrats rail against the corruption they see on the right, yet they seem to ignore corruption within their own ranks. A Democratic senator from Massachusetts was excoriated for “waffling” on the issues, yet the current Republican front runner, a former governor of the same state, is free to change his stance as the situation dictates. Indignations all around.

It’s really becoming necessary to think about everything you want to say beforehand and play a sort of mental chess to determine all the possible interpretations so as not to offend anyone. Think about how much has changed in just a few decades and then extrapolate a few decades into the future. What turn of phrase that we accept now will become offensive in 20 years or so? When we’ve finally eliminated all offending names, jokes, images, and stereotypes for every person on earth, what will the Courtesy Police wring their hands about?

Sorry if I’ve offended anyone.

Field of View

Posted by markj on November 14th, 2007 and filed under People, Politics, War | No Comments »

Think you have a good handle on world events? Got a good picture of what’s going on in Iraq or Afghanistan? If you said yes, guess again. The world, and the Middle East especially, is like a giant jigsaw puzzle. If you can see 5 or 10 pieces fitting together, you’re far ahead of most people. Yet you are still not seeing the whole picture.

I spent last weekend with my nephew, who returned from a tour in Iraq this past summer. He’s a higher ranking non-com who worked in a headquarters operations group. He’s a go-to guy who’s seen a lot. I’ve always felt we Americans have not been getting the whole story, either on the good side or the bad, but this past weekend’s discussions really drove home that point. The newsies filter everything to fit their needs. Doesn’t matter which side of the fence either. They all chop short sound bites out of long interviews with military leaders and paste them all together to shape the story to their liking. They find a talking head who will say what they want to hear and then present the head’s opinion as fact, even though most of the heads know diddly-squat. Everything that goes on in Iraq and Afghanistan is vetted before release to assess its political volitility. Much of it never gets released at all. There are so many variables to consider. How will this event affect the situation in Pakistan? If we release this news and it makes Russia look bad, will they tell the world about the dumb thing the US did? How will this event affect the upcoming elections?

Then there’s the fiasco surrounding military funding. Which branch gets the most? To what lengths will the other branches go in order to increase their piece of the pie? How many soldiers will die simply because their branch wanted more money? And most urgently, how long before we’ve exhausted the whole military? 

Maybe it’s good we don’t know everything. Maybe we really “can’t handle the truth,” as the saying goes. There’s a nagging fear in the back of my mind that things are not good and are going to get much worse. Maybe it’s time to make like an ostrich and just stick my head in the sand. Maybe I just don’t want to know.